Google News opt-in is not good enough, German publishers say - humphreysedgerhy
German publishers volition disappear from Google News on Aug. 1 unless they prefer in to the service equally Google seeks to comply with a new German law. But the publishers said on Monday that this is not good enough, they want a share in Google's revenue.
The law will inherit effect on Aug. 1 and gives publishers the exclusive right to commercialise their products or parts thereof, except in the case of single words or very small text snippets.The length of the text snippets however, is not defined in the law, creating a gray area for news aggregators such as Google that republish parting of the texts.
"In light of this development, and given the uncertainty of the freshly law of nature, we have developed the Google News Confirmed Consent Tool as a confirmation system that German publishers will need to use if they would like to have or continue to get their content included in Google News," Google spokesman Ralf Bremer said via netmail on Monday. The tool was introduced on Fri.
That means that only German publishers that give their consent leave remain in the Google News index after Aug. 1, Bremer said.
"The new confirmed consent tool is designed for German publishers. This means: If a Germanic publisher does not accept the 'confirm consent' his content will not be shown any longer in any edition of Google News, e.g. likewise Swiss or Austrian from August 1st on," Bremer aforementioned in a second email, responding to additional questions.
The Federation of German Newspaper Publishers (BDZV) and the Confederacy of German Magazine publisher Publishers (VDZ) welcomed the prefer-in chemical mechanism, said Peter Klotzki, spokesman for the VDZ. "Google threatened to unlist all the publishers and never puzzle a probability to opt-in again," he aforesaid, adding that in this way publishers beat a choice simply as intended by the law.
"We reject the allegement of Mr. Klotzki," Bremer said in the second email afterward being asked about Klotzki's comments. Google has never threatened to unlist all the publishers giving them zero chance to choose-in again, he aforementioned. "This is simply non true," he said.
Google however argues that the opt-in mechanism is just an addition to other tools publishers tush utilization to see their presence on Google News. "Publishers experience ever been free to decide whether and how their articles should be displayed in Google News. The brand-new tool provides them with an additional option to do so," Bremer said.
If publishers in Germany operating theatre elsewhere do not want to be included they rear end use technical option look-alike robots.txt and meta tags to forbid indexing past Google, the ship's company said in a the blog position in which the consent tool was announced.
But the publishers assume the European nation police force goes further, Klotzki said. The VDZ and the BDZV deprivation a percentage of the revenue Google makes by republishing their content, and this prefer-in tool doesn't let publishers partake in the revenue, helium said.
The law was drafted because the publishers demanded compensation for claimed revenue loss.
Google isn't planning a revenue sharing model though. "Google News is a free service, unbiased by commercial relationships. We want to keep IT that way of life," Bremer said.
"Globally speaking Google drives a immense amount of traffic to publishers gratis—6+ billion visits per month. This provides real value also for German publishers," he aforementioned.
Patc the publishers disagree, they first desire to see what the result of the implementation of the opt-in wish be when the law enters into force, Klotzki said, adding that IT is too early for legal action at law against Google.
Updated at 7:10 a.m. PT to include extra comment from Google.
Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/452583/google-news-optin-is-not-good-enough-german-publishers-say.html
Posted by: humphreysedgerhy.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Google News opt-in is not good enough, German publishers say - humphreysedgerhy"
Post a Comment